Community-led Conservation in Ethiopia’s Tama CCA

The Tama Community Conservation Area (CCA) is the newest and largest CCA in Ethiopia. It stands as a powerful example of community-led stewardship, through the leadership of the resident agropastoralist Mursi (Mun) and Bodi (Me’en), and hunter-gatherer Bacha (Kwegu) people. A mosaic of low forest, hill forest, grassland, and riverine landscapes, the Tama CCA is a sanctuary for biodiversity.

We think there are over 300 different species of birdlife plus multiple endangered mammal species and antelope species critical for food security in hunger times. The CCA offers communities’ formal land tenure protecting them from mega projects nearby (such as the Kuraz Sugar Development Project) which allows conservation, cultural resilience, and local livelihoods to align and pave a path to a sustainable future.  

While these communities have rich traditional ecological knowledge about the biodiversity, there are major data gaps in accounting for the biodiversity with western scientific metrics, which makes informing CCA rules for hunting, grazing, and cultivation challenging. The BioRes project aims to fill these data gaps, explore the linkages between livelihoods, biodiversity, and climate, and inform co-design of the CCA’s adaptive management rules and regulations to support both conservation and sustainable livelihoods of the resident communities. 

On World Conservation Day, it’s critical to remember that wildlife and cultural heritage exist side by side and need management that supports both.

This summer was our final period of biodiversity data collection. Our interdisciplinary team had two areas of research: 

Ethnobotany

Dr. Tizazu Gebre and Dr. Marta Gaworek-Michalczenia are taking different approaches to the study of botanical biodiversity. Dr. Tizazu has been carrying out vegetation surveys with his team from Arba Minch University, documenting the plant species present in the Tama, their population structures, and regeneration status following standard ecological methodologies. By surveying plant communities at regular, fixed intervals along transects across the CCA’s land cover types, Dr. Tizazu and his team can map changes across environmental gradients to evaluate plant communities, species composition, and ecosystem health across diverse environments. 

Additionally, his team employed semi-structured interviews and guided field walks with elders and key herbalists to document local plant names and specific uses (e.g. medicinal, edible, construction etc.). Linking ethnobotanical information with floristic composition in a data sparse region like the Lower Omo bridges Indigenous ecological knowledge with quantitative ecological data, ensuring the resulting quantitative indices and spatial distribution analyses are grounded in the context of the riverine and savanna ecosystems in the Lower Omo Valley. 

Dr. Marta has extended this understanding as this summer her research explored an often-overlooked dimension of conservation: the relationships between people and plants. Using a multispecies ethnographic approach, her team (University of Leeds and our local community liaisons) investigated how agropastoral communities in the Tama CCA interact with, depend on, and coexist with a remarkable diversity of plant species.

Rather than viewing plants simply as natural resources, this approach recognises them as active participants in human social worlds. Throughout her fieldwork, she documented local ecological knowledge and the many ways plants shape everyday life. The data provides insights into the complex interdependencies between people and plants, revealing how biodiversity supports not only ecosystem functions but also cultural identities, social relationships, and community wellbeing. 

Ethnozoology

Tsyon Asfaw Gizaw (University of Leeds) and her team (Ethiopian Wildlife Conservation Authority, Barkede Kulumadere from local NGO OPEN, and CCA scouts) carried out an integrated study related to the zoological biodiversity in the Tama. Building on her prior research in the dry season, Tsyon employed 50 camera traps and 15 audiomoths using a grid across the CCA during the wet season, so we can compare the two datasets and look at seasonal differences in species richness (unique species present in the CCA) as well as start to build an idea of occupancy and abundance. A total of 32 mammalian species have been recorded from analysis thus far, including threatened and iconic wildlife such as the African lion, leopard, giraffe, plains zebra, African buffalo, patas monkey, and ground pangolin, highlighting the area’s rich biodiversity and seasonal wildlife movements.  

Her ecological data collection was coupled with focus groups, building on the approach from the ethnobotany team, to collect traditional ecological knowledge about these species. These conversations found that communities classify wildlife as favourable if the cultural, spiritual, and economic value of the wildlife outweighs the cost. Carnivores and primates are often considered as problem animals as they cause the perceived and actual threats of livestock loss and crop damage, which can result in retaliatory killing and conservation concerns.  

Wildlife remains deeply rooted in identity, traditions, and practices of the Omo people, and participants reported the irreplaceable cultural and spiritual significance of wildlife. Conserving wildlife is therefore essential for preserving traditional governance systems, cultural heritage, and community identity.  

Moving Forwards

Integrating Indigenous knowledge with ecological monitoring has allowed us to document these complex cultural and spiritual landscapes of human–wildlife relationships – critical to develop culturally appropriate, evidence-based conservation strategies that can support biodiversity conservation, sustainable livelihoods, and community resilience. We now better understand which species are most important to communities, why they matter, and how changes in availability may affect livelihoods and food security.

Particularly important to this is climate variability, so one of our next steps is to work with climate modelers to a) construct an understanding of prior climate in the region for the first time (given there are no weather stations in the Tama) and b) explore what climate projections will mean for land cover, and thus biodiversity and livelihoods.  

In the final phase of BioRes we will then work with CCA staff and the governing Council to integrate such understandings into their rules and regulations, so to support adaptive management of the CCA under climate change. Importantly, our research demonstrates that conservation cannot be separated from the cultural and relational values that communities attach to landscapes.

Protecting biodiversity also means protecting the knowledge, practices, and relationships that have developed between people, wildlife, and plants over generations and we want to see this embedded in the CCA’s governance moving forwards. 

 


 

This blog was prepared by Dr. Jenny Hodbod, Associate Professor of Environment and Development, University of Leeds. Jenny’s research explores the creation the resilient and equitable food systems – environmentally and economically sustainable food systems that can feed a growing global population and support their wellbeing whilst adapting to security threats such as climate change, changing preferences, and economic shocks.

Please visit the BioRes: Biodiversity Potential for Resilient Livelihoods in the Lower Omo, Ethiopia page for more on the project.


 

Photo Credits

1. The plains of the Tama CCA (header image), Tsyon Asfaw Gizaw
2. Women in Botech (Bodi) sorting through bush cabbage, Marta Gaworek-Michalczenia
3. Tikawoch one of the most important dry season survival fruit, Marta Gaworek-Michalczenia
4. Setting out camera traps, Tsyon Asfaw Gizaw
5. Lion, captured on the camera traps this field season, Tsyon Asfaw Gizaw
6. Tsyon facilitating a focus group, Tsyon Asfaw Gizaw
7. Dried hippo meat being discussed during a focus group, Tsyon Asfaw Gizaw
8. The first female scouts in the Tama CCA, whose training was supported by this grant, Barkede Kulumadere
9. Mursi women in South Tama, Marta Gaworek-Michalczenia

 

GCBC Awards 12 New Research Projects Through Third Grant Competition

The Global Centre on Biodiversity for Climate (GCBC) is pleased to announce the award of 12 new research projects through its third Research Grant Competition (RGC3), with a total investment of just over £10 million.

Together, the 12 new projects will support researchers, communities, policymakers and practitioners across Sub-Saharan Africa, Southeast Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean, to develop and test solutions that deliver benefits for people, nature and climate.

From strengthening sustainable cattle production in South Africa and restoring mangrove ecosystems in Malaysia, to advancing climate-resilient agroforestry in Timor-Leste and Montserrat and improving food security through sustainable aquaculture in São Tomé and Príncipe, the projects will generate critical evidence on how biodiversity can underpin resilient livelihoods, sustainable economic development and climate adaptation in some of the world’s most vulnerable regions.

The new cohort represents the third round of funding under GCBC, a UK Official Development Assistance (ODA) programme funded by the UK Government’s Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). The programme, announced at COP26 in 2021, supports developing countries to generate the evidence needed to inform policies and decisions that better value, protect, restore and sustainably manage biodiversity, while strengthening climate resilience and contributing to poverty reduction.

Through these investments, GCBC continues to strengthen the global evidence base needed to support biodiversity conservation, climate adaptation and sustainable development. The new projects will contribute knowledge and practical solutions that can inform policy, guide investment and support communities most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change and biodiversity loss.

This announcement comes ahead of the next round of funding, Research Grant Competition 4 (RGC4), with a themes launch planned for the near future.

 

The Global Centre on Biodiversity for Climate is an important international programme generating the evidence we need to understand how biodiversity can support climate resilience and sustainable development. The 12 projects announced in this latest funding round build on that strong foundation, deepening our understanding of how nature can underpin resilient livelihoods, healthy ecosystems and effective climate adaptation. Collectively, they will strengthen the evidence base and partnerships needed to inform policy and drive practical action globally

Professor Anjali Goswami, Defra, Chief Scientific Adviser and Director General for Science, Data and Analysis.

It is particularly exciting that we have several grants supporting Small Island Developing States (SIDS). The particular challenges these islands face under climate change threatens both livelihoods and unique biodiversity. We urgently need research to develop solutions to this huge challenge.

Dr Jamie Gordon, Biodiversity Lead, GCBC

 

Please see the full list of RGC3 projects below, with links to further details. To get in touch, contact GCBC at infogcbc@gcbc.org.uk

 


Newly Awarded Projects

Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RG3-012637):

‘Thriving Ecosystems and Communities in Montserrat: Agroforestry and Sustainable Land Management Solutions’

An investigation into the challenges of restoring forests and integrating climate-smart agriculture in degraded tropical forest landscapes in this small island developing state. Read more

Coventry University (RG3-012624):

‘Enhancing biodiversity, climate resilience and livelihoods through more sustainable and equitable cattle value chains in communal rangelands of South Africa’

Generating research into how Nature-based Solutions can be optimised socially and ecologically in the Maputaland-Pondoland-Albany biodiversity hotspot. Read more

University of Greenwich (RG3-012644):

‘Scaling Nature-Based Solutions for Climate Resilience, Biodiversity Conservation, and Sustainable Livelihoods in Ethiopia’s Drylands: A Participatory Systems Approach’

Generating robust evidence on dryland agriculture transformation through co-design of pathways to deliver enhanced biodiversity, to build climate resilience, and to reduce poverty. Read more

University of Leeds (RG3-012645):

‘AquaRoots: Rooting Shrimp Farming in Biodiversity for Climate Resilience and Food Security’

Piloting sustainable silvo-aquaculture system in northern Mexican mangroves, integrating microecosystem management and biodiversity-based solutions for eco-social and economic resilience. Read more

The University of Manchester (RG3-012619):

REVIVE – Just Restoration and Equitable Value Chains for Inclusive, Viable Mangrove Ecosystems: The case of Malaysia’

Development and testing of hybrid co-governance that couples community participation in decision making, monitoring and grievance redress with improved value chains for higher value products and services. Read more

Bioversity International (RG3-012643):

‘Regenerative Island Futures: Unlocking sustainable food-system opportunities for Ecotourism in Fiji’

An investigation into evidence-based approaches to leveraging the expanding ecotourism market to catalyse the restoration of native forest biodiversity and climate smart agriculture in this small island developing state. Read more

International Centre for Research in Agroforestry (RG3-012630):

‘Fallow Agroecology Biodiversity and Resilience through Integrating Knowledge Systems in the Peruvian Amazon (FABRIKs)’

The application of systems science to Amazonian landscape transformation by demonstrating how fallow management can drive climate resilience, biodiversity gains, and poverty reduction at system, ecosystem, and market levels. Read more

Sokoine University of Agriculture (RG3-012648):

‘Human-Wildlife Interactions: Building Climate Resilience in the Selous-Niassa Wildlife Corridor, Tanzania’

The trial of an innovative, off-grid, AI-powered early warning system integrating indigenous ecological knowledge to reduce conflict and enhance climate resilience in the diverse habitats of this key regional corridor. Read more

Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão (RG3-013874):

‘Sustainable Aquaponics for Food Security and Community Empowerment in São Tomé and Príncipe’

The identification and establishment of the technical, socio-economic and institutional enablers of freshwater aquaponics needed for long-term community ownership in the tropical landscapes of this small island developing state. Read more

International Centre for Research in Agroforestry (RG3-012646):

‘Timor-Leste’s Living Landscapes: Agroforestry for Biodiversity and Resilience (AFBIO)’

An investigation into a landscape-to-seascape approach for establishing a resilient ecological matrix of climate-smart agroforestry and silvofishery systems to support livelihoods and biodiversity in this small island developing state. Read more

National Audubon Society (RG3-012618):

‘Birds for Sustainable Agrifood Systems: strengthening biodiversity, climate resilience, and rural prosperity in Colombia’

Research to align farmer-led solutions with policies and incentives in mixed landscapes of cattle pasture, dryforest, montane forest and wetlands. Read more

 

University of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences (UAES) Umuagwo (RG3-012620):

‘Enhancing Pollinator Biodiversity for Sustainable Agriculture and Climate Resilience’

An investigation into the restoration of agro-ecosystems for pollinator diversity in humid forest zone and in savannah areas of Imo, Ogun and Nasarawa States, Nigeria. Read more


The Global Centre on Biodiversity for Climate (GCBC) is supporting a diverse portfolio of initiatives worldwide. Visit our Projects page to explore our research and see where we’re making an impact.

Enhancing biodiversity, climate resilience and livelihoods through more sustainable and equitable cattle value chains in communal rangelands of South Africa

Project Summary

Countries: South Africa

Delivery Partner: Coventry University

Principal Investigator: Dr James Bennett, Associate Professor, Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, Coventry University

 

Challenge

Through a focus on communal rangelands in the globally important Maputaland- Pondoland- Albany (MPA) biodiversity hotspot in South Africa, this project analyses how Nature- based Solutions (NbS) can be optimised socially and ecologically within a community setting to deliver improved outcomes for biodiversity, climate change and local livelihoods.

Working through an existing Herding for Health (H4H) community engagement model and using a co-construction and ‘living labs’ approach, the project will explore ways to enhance NbS practice and outcomes in three key areas.

    1. Firstly, the development of more appropriate and inclusive institutional arrangements for delivering NbS and monitoring of biodiversity, focused on increased community participation and incorporation of Indigenous Knowledge (IK) and practice.
    2. Secondly, testing how existing and novel (e.g. thinning of invasive trees) NbS approaches can be optimised in time and space to deliver improvements in forage production, soil carbon and biodiversity in rangelands. Related scientific modelling of these outcomes at scale, under different climate projections, will enable evaluation of different rangeland management practices, and will be used as a basis for co-developing community climate adaptation scenarios.
    3. Thirdly, the project will evaluate how these potential improvements in ecosystem services can enhance livelihood outcomes by increasing currently limited opportunities for local people, particularly women, to participate in the beef value chain. Our analysis will identify key opportunities for adapting the current H4H model in communal rangelands, with potential to scale to 9 additional H4H sites in Sub-Saharan Africa.

 


Photo Credit: Granny Mokgakane, a cattle farmer in the communal rangelands of the Kruger to Canyons Biosphere Reserve in South Africa who is implementing sustainable cattle grazing (310A3654) Photographer: M&M Pictures


 

More on the project will be added soon.

In the meantime, explore our Projects page to discover the diverse portfolio of initiatives GCBC is supporting around the world, and see where our research is making an impact.

Scaling Nature-Based Solutions for Climate Resilience, Biodiversity Conservation, and Sustainable Livelihoods in Ethiopia’s Drylands: A Participatory Systems Approach

Project Summary

Countries: Ethiopia

Delivery Partner: University of Greenwich

Project Partners: CIAT – Centro Internacional de Agricultura TropicalHaramaya University, Makobu Enterprises Plc

Principal Investigator: Dr. Mofakkarul Islam, Associate Professor of Food Security, Environment and Development, University of Greenwich

 

Challenge

The project aims to transform farming systems in Ethiopia’s Central Rift Valley (CRV) drylands by scaling Nature-based Solutions (NbS) that enhance biodiversity, build climate resilience, and reduce poverty. Over 1.5 million CRV smallholders face mounting risks from drought, land degradation, and water scarcity, threatening food security and livelihoods. Promising NbS – such as agroforestry, conservation agriculture, regenerative grazing, and wetland restoration – already exist, yet their long-term effectiveness, scalability, trade-offs, and enabling conditions remain poorly evidenced, especially under changing climatic and socioeconomic dynamics.

Our theory of change is that by generating robust evidence on which NbS deliver the greatest co-benefits, co-designing pathways with communities and policymakers, and embedding these in supportive policy, finance, and extension systems, we can enable widespread adoption. Participatory System Dynamics Modelling (SDM), augmented by Artificial Intelligence, will assess NbS effectiveness and trade-offs, providing policymakers and development partners with credible evidence, decision support tools, and guidance, while participatory co-design processes will strengthen stakeholder capacity and ownership, thus supporting institutional reforms that promote NbS adoption at scale.

This in turn will deliver improved soil health, water retention, biodiversity, and climate resilience, enhancing farm productivity and diversifying incomes. All project outputs and engagement will actively consider Gender Equity and Social Inclusion (GESI), ensuring women, youth, and marginalised groups benefit from more equitable opportunities.

 


More on the project will be added soon.

In the meantime, explore our Projects page to discover the diverse portfolio of initiatives GCBC is supporting around the world, and see where our research is making an impact.

Human-Wildlife Interactions: Building Climate Resilience in the Selous-Niassa Wildlife Corridor

Project Summary

Countries: Tanzania

Principal Investigator: Dr. Robert Byamungu, Sokoine University of Agriculture

 

Challenge

Selous-Niassa Wildlife Corridor, covering 10,000 km² between Tanzania and Mozambique, is a vital transboundary conservation area linking Selous Game Reserve and Niassa Reserve. It supports key species like elephants, lions, and wild dogs but faces growing threats from human-wildlife conflict, habitat degradation, and climate change impacts. Local communities lose over 350 acres of crops annually—amounting to $120,000 in economic losses— deepening poverty. Climate change worsens resource competition, while traditional conflict mitigation tools remain ineffective due to poor infrastructure and lack of real-time data.

This project introduces an innovative, off-grid, AI-powered early warning system integrating Indigenous ecological knowledge to reduce conflict and enhance climate resilience. A phased approach will establish 24 transects for baseline data collection and deploy 72 AI-enabled cameras with solar-powered deterrents. A decentralized mesh network will transmit data without relying on traditional infrastructure to trigger alerts on wildlife movement, fire risks, and weather. A custom offline mobile app will deliver timely alerts to communities, aiding in conflict prevention and enabling climatesmart agriculture.

Capacity building focuses on gender equality and inclusion, training women and marginalized groups as “Technology Champions” to promote local ownership. Expected outcomes include a 60% reduction in human-wildlife conflict, 50% drop in crop losses, improved economic opportunities, and enhanced biodiversity conservation. The project’s open-source tools and policy framework offer a scalable model for sustainable coexistence across Africa’s wildlife corridors.

 


Photo Credits: Images are of the Selous-Niassa landscape:

1. Land cleared for agriculture, Photographer: Felcian Ezekiel

2. Intact woodland habitat, Photographer: Felcian Ezekiel

3. A group photo of representatives from SUA and partner organisations involved in the GCBC-funded project, taken at SUA on 1 Jul 2026. The people in the photo are (back row, left to right): Eustace Abraham, Robert Byamungu, David Kaberege, Martha Moshi.  Front row (left to right): Philipo Mtweve, Merci Ayo. Photographer is Philomena Magoti.

4. Road bisecting grassland habitat, Photographer: Felcian Ezekiel

 


More on the project will be added soon.

In the meantime, explore our Projects page to discover the diverse portfolio of initiatives GCBC is supporting around the world, and see where our research is making an impact.

Sustainable Aquaponics for Food Security and Community Empowerment in São Tomé and Príncipe

Project Summary

Countries: São Tomé & Príncipe

Principal Investigator: Idalina Dias Sardinha, Invited Associate Professor at ISEG and Senior Researcher at ISEG Research, Universidade de Lisboa, specialising in Sustainability Science.

 

Challenge

This SISTA project addresses the critical nexus of poverty, climate vulnerability, and biodiversity loss in São Tomé and Príncipe by establishing a sustainable, community-driven aquaponics model. Our innovative approach will develop a climate-resilient pilot system using local materials, integrating tilapia with the native freshwater prawn to enhance biodiversity. A key element is the creation of an eco-efficient, closed-loop system based on principles of circular economy, by producing sustainable fish feed from local agricultural waste, thereby overcoming a major cost driver for aquaponics in Small Island Developing States (SIDS) and minimizing environmental impact.

Therefore, SISTA employs a transdisciplinary methodology, structured in three phases: 1) Co-design and Pilot Implementation, 2) Vocational Training and Capacity Building, and 3) Scaling and Enterprise Development.

The project’s transformative change is anchored in identifying and establishing the essential technical, socio-economic and institutional enablers of aquaponics, such as inclusive governance and sustainable business models, that ensure long-term community ownership of 10–15 community-managed units.

This foundation empowers vulnerable groups, especially women and youth, through a comprehensive vocational training program, fostering local entrepreneurship and livelihoods. By scaling this proven model to 10–15 community-managed units, SISTA will directly enhance food security, increase incomes, and build climate resilience. Co-created with local partners, the project delivers a scalable blueprint for sustainable food production that ensures long-term impact and serves as a model for other SIDS.

 


More on the project will be added soon.

In the meantime, explore our Projects page to discover the diverse portfolio of initiatives GCBC is supporting around the world, and see where our research is making an impact.

Enhancing Pollinator Biodiversity for Sustainable Agriculture and Climate Resilience

 

Challenge

This project aims to enhance pollinator (bees, moths, butterflies, wasps, and hoverflies) biodiversity within smallholder farming systems to improve agricultural productivity, climate resilience, and ecosystem sustainability. By integrating agroecological practices (use of bee pastures, set aside hedgerows and nesting sites, grow a variety of crops, including annuals and perennials, and plant flowering plants at different times of the year, using integrated pest management, minimize tillage to avoid disturbing underground insect nests), pollinator-friendly habitat restoration, and precision pollination technologies, the project will support pollinator populations critical for food security.

The research will assess the impact of biodiversity-enhancing interventions, develop climate resilient pollination strategies, and engage local communities in conservation efforts. Deliverables include scientific assessments of pollinator diversity, AI-driven monitoring tools (crop monitoring drones, wireless sensor networks, Internet of Things), eDNA assessments, farmer training programs, and policy recommendations for biodiversity-friendly agriculture.

The outcomes will contribute to poverty reduction by increasing crop yields and farmer incomes, support climate adaptation through resilient ecosystems, and promote biodiversity conservation by restoring pollinator habitats.

 


More on the project will be added soon.

In the meantime, explore our Projects page to discover the diverse portfolio of initiatives GCBC is supporting around the world, and see where our research is making an impact.

Peatlands at Risk: Lessons from the Amazon and Congo Basins

There is a familiar rhythm to life on peatlands. Living and farming in wetland environments is undeniably challenging. Over generations, the search for higher ground has been a key adaptive strategy, and communities have developed remarkable knowledge and skills to thrive in these waterlogged environments.

Dr Euridice Honorio Coronado, PI, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

 

Within the vast wetlands of the Amazon and the Congo Basins, tropical peatlands are among the world’s most important carbon-rich ecosystems — yet their biodiversity and dynamics remain poorly understood.

Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew is leading a project – Using Biodiversity to Support Climate Resilient Livelihoods in Intact Tropical Peatlands – exploring these complex peatland systems, examining plant biodiversity, how vegetation responds to changing flooding regimes, and the livelihoods of communities who depend on these ecosystems. By comparing peatlands across the Amazon and Congo Basins, the project is generating valuable insights into both the similarities that connect these landscapes and the striking differences that shape them.

The following account is written by Dr Euridice Honorio Coronado, Research Leader, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.


 

Discussions about the future of peatlands often focus on the threats they face from infrastructure development and agricultural expansion. While these pressures are real, they tell only part of the story.

We began 2026 by bringing together five partners for a workshop to share newly collected datasets and early findings from fieldwork undertaken in 2025. On this project, the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew is partnering with the Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonia Peruana (Peru), the Université Marien N’Gouabi (The Republic of Congo), the University of Kisangani (The Democratic Republic of Congo – DRC), the University of St Andrews (UK), and the University of Leeds (UK).

On the ground, we find that many peatlands in both basins remain relatively hydrologically intact, although their condition varies regionally. These landscapes are shaped by complex ecological processes, long histories of human interaction, and distinct political and social contexts that are unique to each basin. However, pressures are increasing as surrounding forests rapidly disappear, as seen in the DRC.

In Amazonia, some peatland areas fall within legally recognised Indigenous territories, protected areas, and other formal land-tenure regimes where communities may hold rights to manage forests and sustain local livelihoods. Case studies of long-term community-based management provide evidence that peatland resources can support local economies without requiring deforestation or drainage. However, projects of new infrastructure and extractive industries may pose risks to these systems.

In the Congo basin, land use is governed through state permits and concessions for resource extraction, often overlapping with customary land claims that lack formal recognition. This presents a challenging governance environment, yet communities continue to depend on peatland resources for subsistence and income generation. Pressures are increasing as surrounding forests rapidly disappear, as seen in the DRC, and new roads improve access to previously remote peatland areas, such as in the Republic of Congo.

Interestingly, peatlands in both basins are characterised by distinct vegetation types, including palm-dominated swamps and tree-dominated forests such as pole forests and hardwood forests. These ecosystems are acidic and remain waterlogged, which promotes peat accumulation and slows decomposition.  In addition, peatlands in both basins support a diverse range of natural resource uses, including fishing, hunting, and the harvesting of non-timber forest products such as fruits, fibres, and medicinal plants.

Moreover, there is a familiar rhythm to life on peatlands. Living and farming in wetland environments is undeniably challenging. Over generations, the search for higher ground has been a key adaptive strategy, and communities have developed remarkable knowledge and skills to thrive in these waterlogged environments.

Local traditions reflect a deep understanding of ecosystems, rivers and islands; the long use of natural resources and local crops as well as those that have travelled across continents; and the profound cultural significance of wetlands. Recognising and safeguarding this ecological and social complexity is essential for building a resilient future for tropical peatlands and the communities who depend on them.

 

What’s Next?

During this financial year, our research teams will focus on three main priorities. First, we will move forward with data analysis and writing, developing the first drafts of a checklist of vascular plant species across tropical peatlands and their conservation status. This will include a brief bringing together case studies on biodiversity and best practices that help maintain the ecological integrity of tropical peatlands.

Second, field activities will continue with the retrieval and consolidation of first-year water table data collected, strengthening our understanding of peatland hydrology across sites. Finally, we will organise stakeholder workshops to ensure that project outputs effectively inform policy and practice in tropical peatland conservation.


 

Written by Dr Euridice Honorio Coronado, Principal Investigator. Euriduce’s journey into peatland research began in 2008, when she established permanent forest plots in Loreto, northern Peru, as part of the Amazon Forest Inventory Network (RAINFOR). At that time, RAINFOR focused largely on intact terra firme forests, with limited representation of the vast Amazonian wetlands. This gap became a central motivation in her work, first at the Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonía Peruana and now at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

Discover more: Using Biodiversity to Support Climate Resilient Livelihoods in Intact Tropical Peatlands

From Evidence to Engagement: A Toolkit for Working with Policymakers

Good evidence does not always speak for itself.

Across GCBC programming, experience shows that whether research informs policy depends as much on relationships, trust, timing, and communication, as it does on the quality of the evidence itself.

The GCBC Theory of Change recognises that policy action rarely follows a linear path from research to uptake; instead, change emerges through ongoing engagement, demonstration, and learning within complex systems where political will and coordination can’t be taken for granted.

The following toolkit brings together grantee reflections on a simple but critical question:

What ways of sharing your work or building relationships have helped to engage policymakers? What made it easier -or harder - for policymakers to use your ideas or evidence?

Drawing on experience across diverse contexts, this toolkit situates policy engagement within both direct and indirect spheres of influence, focusing on intermediate outcomes such as stronger networks, greater salience of evidence, and better positioning of solutions for use.

In doing so, it reflects GCBC’s role as a knowledge and network mobiliser, helping evidence travel from projects into the systems where decisions are made.

Working with Indigenous Peoples and local communities: 8 Lessons from GCBC Research

Research conducted in partnership with Indigenous Peoples and local communities (IPLCs) is increasingly shown to develop stronger, more inclusive understanding of our shared environment¹. By grounding evidence in local realities and lived experience, such approaches improve the relevance, impact, and resilience of interventions.

At GCBC, we place strong emphasis on incorporating local and Indigenous knowledge into the development of scalable and policy-relevant solutions. However, the role of IPLCs in research partnerships is complicated. In many projects, they may simultaneously be the subjects of research, the implementers of research, and the expected beneficiaries of the solutions developed.

At the same time, the relationship between researchers and IPLCs may be characterised by very distinct priorities, significant power imbalances, and different ways of interpreting the world.

Recognising this complexity, GCBC invited grant recipients to share their reflections on conducting research with Indigenous Peoples and local communities, in particular highlighting the insights they were gaining in the process. Specifically, we asked:

What has the project learned about the necessary conditions to secure the engagement of local and Indigenous communities in the research?

The responses touch on a number of interconnected issues. Eight main insights emerged and are summarised below.

1. Early and Continued Engagement
Our projects emphasise that partnerships with Indigenous Peoples and local communities should begin early and continue throughout the research process.

Engagement should go beyond simple consultation.

For our project in Panama, for example, the proposed research emerged from a year-long consultation process, grounded in a much longer-standing relationship between one project partner and an Indigenous council².

In Ethiopia, ongoing dialogue between researchers and communities strengthened mutual understanding and helped reduce the risk of misconceptions³. A similar approach was taken by our researchers in Madagascar, where Indigenous Peoples and local communities were regularly updated on research progress and invited to evaluate the successes and challenges⁴.

2. Community-Led Research Framing

Much social and natural science research starts with a tightly defined set of research questions, the framing of which is usually led solely by researchers. Our projects demonstrate how this approach must be reconfigured to accommodate IPLCs perspectives and needs.

Experiences from Colombia highlight that meaningful engagement in research needs to be about more than just involving IPLCs in data collection – it begins with co-creating meaningful research questions that matter to the communities themselves⁵. This is supported by work in Indonesia which suggests that engagement with IPLCs is dependent on research questions being informed and shaped by them from the outset⁶.

The process of defining research questions can potentially be complex, as research in Peru and Ecuador reveals. Farmer-led research often follows its own logic and pace in ways that differ from formal institutional projects⁷.

Yet, experience from Ecuador and Viet Nam suggests that ultimately communities are more willing to engage in research activities when research agendas and research questions align with their needs.

3. Informed Consent

In our work with IPLCs, consent, often expressed as Free, Prior, Informed Consent (FPIC), is a fundamental principle – and sometimes legal requirement. For example, for a project working in Malaysia, engagement is based on a voluntary agreement made with full knowledge of the project’s scope, purpose, risks, and benefits⁹.

Gaining consent is not always a quick process. In Cambodia, trust and flexibility were required to gain consent and community support for the project. As a result, communities valued the opportunity to determine the project’s focus and to highlight the importance of their own knowledge¹⁰.

In some cases, FPIC is not just as an ethical necessity but also of practical importance too. For instance, a project in Ecuador found it fundamental for reinforcing community confidence and fostering long-term collaboration¹¹.

4. Communications and Transparency

Good communication with IPLCs emerged as a key attribute of project implementation. Our project in Guatemala detailed communication’s importance for a range of project needs including how information is to be used, how impartiality in data collection is assured, and how communities retain decision-making power over research that affects them¹².

The importance of communications tailored to specific groups was highlighted by one of our projects in Ethiopia that used communication approaches specifically designed for different groups to ensure gender and social inclusivity¹³.

However, good communication goes beyond the flow of information between researchers and IPLCs. Experiences in Colombia and the Dominican Republic suggest that projects can also act as a communication channel between members of the community¹⁴.

5. Power Dynamics

Attention to power dynamics was important across various contexts. In Malaysia this required awareness of researchers’ own effect on those dynamics and the need to continually reflect on their power and impact on IPLCs¹⁵.

In Malawi and Uganda, power was a consideration in the implementation of fieldwork, where workshops required taking language and social dynamics into account to encourage the engagement of community members¹⁶.

Understanding power dynamics was also critical in relation to outcomes and ownership with our project in Peru. This highlighted the important role of good facilitators in ensuring that project participants, including women, whose involvement may be constrained by household power dynamics, can take ownership of the research and engage with confidence¹⁷.

One aspect of the project is to examine local governance structures and their power dynamics to support the effectiveness and equity of forest restoration in relation to local communities’¹⁸.

6. Traditional Knowledge

One of the core delivery principles of all GCBC projects is the requirement to consider and integrate local and Indigenous knowledge into research. It is therefore unsurprising that this was prominent in the approaches of our projects. A few selected responses variously show how Indigenous and local knowledge has made fundamental contributions.

In Ethiopia it was found that community members were more willing to collaborate when their knowledge was treated as important and central¹⁹. Whilst for a project in Colombia, the belief that IPLCs hold valuable knowledge was considered the starting point for the project²⁰.

From another project in Colombia, there is recognition that Indigenous and local knowledge has transformed the way the project is conceptualised and supported²¹. In Indonesia it was noted that understanding food and land management practices led to a better appreciation of how food security is currently addressed²².

7. Shared Benefits

The production of knowledge through research alone does not guarantee that Indigenous Peoples and local communities will benefit. Ensuring that communities gain from the process is therefore a key challenge for GCBC projects. For example, a project in Ecuador found that community engagement deepens when they perceive direct, equitable benefits, such as training and technical assistance²³

In the Cham Islands in Viet Nam the project has learnt that engagement requires continuous consultation, mutual trust, and tangible local benefits²⁴Training was also noted from Kenya as one of various tangible short-term benefits that could strengthen participation whilst longer term project outcomes were yet to be delivered²⁵.

“We believe that IPLCs should benefit tangibly and intangibly from our research”²⁶.

8. Trust

Beyond the specific points noted above, a particular issue permeates and unites the responses. That issue is trust. Many of the responses were, explicitly or implicitly, about how trust is built between researchers and communities and how trust leads to better research outcomes.

      • Building trust is essential; this means recognising community knowledge systems, ensuring transparent communication and co-developing research goals²⁷.
      • An emerging insight from the first stakeholder workshop is that successful integration of traditional and scientific knowledge depends on long-term dialogue andtrust-building²⁸.
      • Securing the genuine engagement of local and Indigenous communities requires creating relationships grounded in mutualtrust, cultural respect, and continuous communication²⁹.
      • Field visits and workshops, where researchers listen before proposing solutions, have also been essential to build trust and gain a better understanding of real-world challenges farmers are faced with³⁰.
      • Trust has been built through regular consultations with local fishers and community representatives on seagrass habitats, ensuring their knowledge informs research design and monitoring³¹.

Reflections on Inclusive Research

The eight key points above represent a snapshot of current thinking and practice across GCBC projects. Whilst the responses touch on many interrelated issues, they highlight that our projects strive to be participatory in their approach to working with IPLCs and use a variety of participatory tools to guide their research.

Although these insights do not capture the entirety of the understanding gained, nor are they a complete guide to doing research with IPLCs, they offer valuable lessons and guidance.

More detailed and specific guidance for research with IPLCs is provided by Newing et al (2024)³². Their work is derived from interactions with a wider set of researchers and projects than informs our survey and consequently covers a wider range of issues. Whilst there are areas of notable similarity between their fourteen principles, and the experiences emerging from our survey, both deserve consideration when planning research with IPLCs.

Finally, ensuring that rights holders such as IPLCs are fully engaged in conservation action is not just a research issue, but relevant to all aspects of the planning and implementation of environmental conservation.

Recognising this, Principles for Inclusive Nature Action have been developed by Defra to place equitable, rights-based inclusion at the centre of all biodiversity action. GCBC supports the implementation of those principles.

 

 

Endnotes


1. Contributions of Indigenous Knowledge to ecological and evolutionary understanding. Jessen et al 2021 https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2435
2. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute: Forest Restoration on Indigenous Lands: Restoring Biodiversity for Multiple Ecosystem Services, Community Resilience and Financial Sustainability through Locally Informed Strategies and Incentives
3. Bioversity International: Deploying Diversity for Resilience and Livelihoods
4. The Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust (WWT) Following the Water: Participatory Research to Understand Drivers and Nature-based Solutions to Wetland Degradation in Madagascar
5. Fundación Tropenbos Colombia: Creation of an Intercultural Biodiverse Seed Bank with the Indigenous “Resguardo Puerto Naranjo” for Enhancing Restoration and Conservation Efforts in Degraded Areas in the Colombian Amazon
6. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED): Nature Nuture
7. International Potato Center (CIP): Andean Crop Diversity for Climate Change
8. Oxford University: The Flourishing Landscapes Programme
9. The Scottish Association for Marine Science (SAMS): GlobalSeaweed-SUPERSTAR: Supporting livelihoods by Protecting, Enhancing and Restoring biodiversity by Securing the future of the seaweed Aquaculture industry in developing countries
10. Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), USA: SARIKA: Scientific Action Research for Indigenous Knowledge Advancement: Recognising and Rewarding the Contribution of Indigenous Knowledge for the Sustainable Management of Biodiversity
11. UTPL: BIOAMAZ: Realising the potential of plant bioresources as new economic opportunities for the Ecuadorian Amazon: developing climate resilient sustainable bioindustry
12. University of Greenwich: Nature based solutions for climate resilience of local and indigenous communities in Guatemala
13. University of Aberdeen: Cataloguing and Rating of Opportunities for Side-lined Species in Restoration of Agriculturally Degraded Soils in Sub-Saharan Africa (CROSSROADS)
14. University of Lincoln: NATIVE: Sustainable Riverscape Management for Resilient Riverine Communities
15. The Scottish Association for Marine Science (SAMS): GlobalSeaweed-SUPERSTAR: Supporting livelihoods by Protecting, Enhancing and Restoring biodiversity by Securing the future of the seaweed Aquaculture industry in developing countries
16. University of Birmingham: Building adaptive fisheries governance capacity
17. International Potato Center (CIP): Andean Crop Diversity for Climate Change
18. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute: Forest Restoration on Indigenous Lands: Restoring Biodiversity for Multiple Ecosystem Services, Community Resilience and Financial Sustainability through Locally Informed Strategies and Incentives
19. University of Leeds: Biodiversity potential for resilient livelihoods in the Lower Omo, Ethiopia
20. Fundación Tropenbos Colombia: Creation of an Intercultural Biodiverse Seed Bank with the Indigenous “Resguardo Puerto Naranjo” for Enhancing Restoration and Conservation Efforts in Degraded Areas in the Colombian Amazon
21. Corporación de Investigación y Acción Social y Económica (CIASE): Gran Tescual Indigenous Reservation Climate Plan
22. University of Sussex: Exploring sustainable land use pathways for ecosystems, food security and poverty alleviation: opportunities for Indonesia’s food estate program
23. Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral (ESPOL): Empowerment of coastal communities in sustainable production practices in Ecuador
24. The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF): Translating Research into Action for Livelihoods and Seagrass (TRIALS) – Establishing scientific foundation for seagrass restoration and blue carbon potential, with sustainable livelihood development for coastal communities in Central Vietnam
25. CSIR-CRI, EMBRACE: Engaging Local Communities in Endangered Trees and Minor Crops Utilization for Biodiversity Conservation and Livelihood Enrichment
26. The Scottish Association for Marine Science (SAMS): GlobalSeaweed-SUPERSTAR: Supporting livelihoods by Protecting, Enhancing and Restoring biodiversity by Securing the future of the seaweed Aquaculture industry in developing countries
27. University of Aberdeen: Cataloguing and Rating of Opportunities for Side-lined Species in Restoration of Agriculturally Degraded Soils in Sub-Saharan Africa (CROSSROADS)
28. Lancaster University: Enabling large-scale and climate-resilient forest restoration in the Eastern Amazon
29. UTPL: Realizing the potential of plant bioresources as new economic opportunities for the Ecuadorian Amazon: developing climate resilient sustainable bioindustry
30. Oxford University: The Flourishing Landscapes Programme
31. The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF): Translating Research into Action for Livelihoods and Seagrass (TRIALS) – Establishing scientific foundation for seagrass restoration and blue carbon potential, with sustainable livelihood development for coastal communities in Central Vietnam
32. ‘Participatory’ conservation research involving indigenous peoples and local communities: Fourteen principles for good practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110708

 


Photo Credits
  • Header image and Photo 1: Fisherman on Lake Sofia, Madagascar. Used with permission from the Wildlife and Wetlands Trust.
  • Photo 2: Sam At Rachana and Pin Plil, members of the CIPO research team, with Mr Treub Thaeum, Chief of the Bunong Indigenous community at Pu Kong, in the Brey Ngak sacred forest of the Bunong people, Cambodia. Photographer: Tong Len.
  • Photo 3: Women from the Pasto community outside their restaurant initiative in the resguardo, Colombia, with Daniela Torres, Mama Genith Quitiaquez, Taita Vicente Obando, Ricardo Ibarguen, Wendy Toro and Rosa Emilia Salamanca (Corporación de Investigación y Acción Social y Económica – CIASE).
  • Photo 4: Researchers and local community members from the Bioamaz project during a workshop on safeguards and plant socialisation in the Shuar San Antonio Community, Ecuador.